Rover 2000
It is a curious
fact that the more is willing to spend on a car the more difficult it becomes to
find one which accentuates quality and comfort, without over-emphasizing
performance and size to a degree which many motorists find more embarrassing
than useful. The Rover cannot be criticized on these grounds and at £1.264 it
fits neatly into the middle of the £1.000 and £1.500 price bracket, one of the
few ranges in which choice is very limited.
Comfort is
the keynote of this car. From the point of view of ride we would put it in the
top three amongst European cars irrespective of price. Since the handling,
roadholding and general stybility give both driver and passengers the utmost
confidence, and the Dunlop disc brakes are exceptionally powerful, the mental
aspect of comfort is covered as well as the physical side.
The driving
position, the seats, the controls and the interior environment generally are
fully up on this standard. One has the impression that it was planned by
engineers who are enthusiastic drivers and by stylists who put function before
decoration, and the result is something of an object lesson to other
manufacturers. Boldly, and we think sensibly, the decision was made to furnish
the car as luxurious four-seater and, although there is room to carry a fifth in
the back when necessary, such a contingency is not allowed to compromise this
essential purpose.
In refinement
our test car fell a little below the very high standard set by previous Rovers.
It is a quiet car generally, particularly at high speeds, but when travelling
slowly, tyre noise can be prominent at some bad surfaces. The gearbox, too,
could well be less audible in second and third speeds, and the engine becomes
rather fussy well before its generous 6.000 rpm limit is reached. We have to
make these remarks on the evidence of two pre-production samples, although we
are well aware that substantial improvements may have been made by the time
production cars reach the public. For this reason potential buyers would be well
advised to form their own opinions on later models.
When we were
driving the Rover (without nameplates) on test several weeks before its
announcement date, it was intriguing to see how little public reaction it
aroused. Most people probably summed it up as Italian, expensive and
unattainable. Judging by its maximum speed of 104 mph and remarkably good steady
speed fuel consumption, its elegant but unobtrusive lines must be
aerodynamically very efficient.
Performance
The Rover
cruises with that effortless stride which seems peculiar to very high-geared
four-cylinder cars. With a top gear giving 19.5 mph/1.000 rpm, there seems to be
no need for an overdrive, even when speeds in the nineties are held for long
distances on the motorway. A very creditable mean maximum speed of 104 mph
corresponds to about 5.300 rpm, and even 110 mph, which was seen on the accurate
speedometer on one downhill stretch, is comfortably below the 6.000 rpm engine
limit.
For the lower
gears this limit is clearly marked on the instrument face at the unusually high
maximum of 30, 55 and 85 mph; since top gear acceleration is not very rapid,
although quite smooth even from very low speeds, the gears must be used freely
when hurrying. Second gear, in particular, sweeps the car rapidly up the speed
range in a very satisfying way, but against the quiet background level engine
noise becomes much more noticeable in the intermediates. There is a resonance in
the region of 4.000 rpm, and a rising sound level above 5.000 rpm which
discourages regular use of this region. The ability to reach 50 mph in just over
10 seconds and to cover the standing quarter mile in 19.4 seconds puts the Rover
on a par with most saloons of up to a litre greater capacity.
Starting is
instantaneous with momentary use of the choke, and warming up is very rapid. A
re-start on the 1-in-4 test hill was accomplished easily in the high bottom
gear, but the ability to take-off on 1-in-3 with the full test load proved
marginal.
Transmission
A short rigid
lever controls a close-ratio gearbox with powerful synchromesh on the forward
ratios. For very rapid changes the synchromesh resistance makes the movement
rather notchy, but normal shifts are accomplished with a light easy movement,
only marred by some clonking from the remote-control linkage. The reverse
position is made available by squeezing a T-shaped sliding catch upwards towards
the knob, a reversion to a vintage arrangement which is both easy and
convenient, and which obviates the struggles which can arise with lifting levers
and spring-loaded gates.
On our test
car, second and third gears whined at low to medium speeds, particularly on the
overrun. In some cars this noise would hardly be noticed, but the subdued
environment of the Rover throws it into prominence and work is in progress to
eliminate it. The diaphragm clutch is smooth, has a moderate travel and is as
light as most 1 1/2 litre cars. On the standing-start acceleration tests it
gripped in a very positive manner, but the de Dion-suspended rear wheels refused
to spin. By the use of torsional flexible shafts in the transmission and radial
cord tyres, the drive is heavily cushioned against shock; possibly it is
slightly too springy since clumsy driving in the lower gears excites some fore
and aft surging motion.
Running costs
Even when
accelerating at full throttle from below 10 mph in top gear there was no pinking
on premium grade fuel; on a 9.1 comprsssion ratio this spoaks well for the
unusual combustion chamber shape. More impressive still is the extraordinary
fuel consumption at steady speeds in top gear. There are cars of less than half
its engine size which fail to achieve 41 mpg at 50 mph, and there are very few
cars of any size which can combine 48 mpg at 30 mph with 23 mpg at 90 mph. With
this tremendous range the overall consumption is more dependent than usual on
driving speeds and methods. A few typical examples are shown below:
Rush-hour
driving in city traffic. Average speed 13 mph |
21.0 mpg |
Motorway
running at 90 mph average speed, cruising speed 90-95 mph |
22.5 mpg |
Very hard
main road driving making full use of gears and reaching 90 mph
whenever possible, average speed 51 mph |
24.0 mpg |
Main road touring, cruising speed 50-60
mph, mainly top gear |
33.0 mpg |
The Rover Company makes no recommendations for service charges
but since there is only one greasing point (the sliding joint of the propeller
shaft) to be lubricated at 5.000-mile intervals, the cost should be low. With
the possible exception of the fuel pump, all the accessories and components
which normally need attention are very accessible, the battery and oil filter
notably so.
Handling
The Rover“s stability at high speeds is most striking. One
narrow, bumpy, cambered lane on which most cars feel unsafe or very
uncomfortable at 70 mph was taken at an almost unprecedented 95 mph with no
conscious awareness of holding it on a straight line. Fast bends can be taken
very rapidly indeed with the same confidence; there is little roll or tyre
squeal and wheel adhesion is little affected by rough surfaces.
To say that it can be thrown round sharper and slower corners
like a good sports car would be an exaggeration. In these extreme conditions it
remains very safe but there is some wheel fight on bumps in spite of the
steering damper and rather too much understeer for really rapid response,
particularly in the wet. Nevertheless, very few saloons of comparable size and
weight (let alone comfort) come nearer to deserving the compliment.
For manoeuvring at walking speeds and less, the steering is
fairly heavy; on the move this heaviness disappears, leaving a smooth,
friction-free control which is light enough to make an arm“s-length driving
position effortless and enjoyable. On the other hand, with 3 3/4 turns from lock
to lock and a very good turning circle of just over 30 ft., its gearing is high
enough to make violent twirling unnecessary, so that the compromise has been
extremely well made.
Brakes
In progressive feel and sheer power, the Dunlop disc brakes are
amongst the best we have tried. They are of a size which would be adequate for a
considerably heavier and faster car, and our fade tests had a negligible effect
on their performance. The water splash produced a momentary reduction of
efficiency but one stop from 30 mph restored them to normal.
Since at one time disc hand brakes were nearly always
unsatisfactory, it is worth mentioning that the one fitted to the Rover, of
self-adjusting design, not only held the car quite easily on a 1-in-3 gradient
but also give the best deceleration from 30 mph that we have yet recorded.
Comfort and control
It is doubtful whether there is any car in which four people can
undertake a long journey more comfortably. Although, as we have already
indicated, the suspension is rather audible at low speeds when dealing with
sharp-edged road shocks, this is noise rather than feel and it copes superbly
with a vast range of other conditions. Damping is heavy enough to eliminate the
floating motion which upsets many people and light enough to avoid the sudden
jolts and surges for which it can be responsible. Sudden dips and hump-backed
bridges are taken smoothly, and pitching is almost unnoticeable, even under
heavy braking. All these remarks apply to the rear seats as well as the front
ones.
All four passengers sit in well-upholstered armchairs properly
shaped to support the spine and curved for lateral support. In the back there
are small arm rests each side and a wide central one which can be folded away to
leave room for a central passenger sitting rather high with little headroom on
upholstery of uncomfortable shape. Long legs are accommodated comfortably in the
rear by virtue of seats which are high off the floor and ample foot room under
the front cushions.
Since the high sitting position is particularly noticeable in the
front, we were surprised to find that the driver“s eye height was some two
inches lower than in a newly-designed 1 1/2-litre saloon on test at the same
time - an indication of the importance of having the lowest possible floor
level. The backrests can be friction-locked in any position by a convenient
lever, and we found this Rover-designed mechanism preferable to the more common
notched systems which move in finite steps. Most drivers found a tendency to
slide forward along the rather flat seat cushions, thus losing support for the
lower part of the back. More rearward slope on the cushion might prevent this,
or a bracing rest for the left foot, since the toe board is out of reach.
Few cars are so adaptable to drivers of different size. An
enormous range of seat adjustment is supplemented by a steering wheel which can
be moved up and down by more than an inch after slacking a hand nut to the right
of the column, pivoting as it moves about a universal joint near the bulkhead.
This unusual and very valuable feature makes it possible to find an almost ideal
driving position. Some tall drivers sitting right back found the gear lever knob
rather far away, but this too can easily be altered by a service station.
Low wind noise, achieved by careful draught sealing, is
complemented by a built-in heating and ventilating system which enables all the
windows to remain closed except in hot weather. The driver and front passenger
have separate cold air grilles in the facia with small levers for controlling
the volume of air and deflector flaps for its direction. The flow can be
increased still further with the very quiet two-stage booster fan on, without
too much extra noise, by opening the rear quarter-lights. With a full tank, a
strong smell of petrol penetrates to the interior.
All-round visibility is good, the forward“view, though a very
deep screen over a sharply failing bonnet, particularly so. A convex mirror
gives a wide field of vision to the rear, but many people dislike the misleading
nature of its diminished image. Four headlights give an excellent spread of
light for night driving, and the reversing light is automatically switched.
Fittings and furniture
Careful thought and clever design distinguishes the interior
layout. It is modern and rational and yet it still looks and feels, and ever
smells like a Rover. A large clear strip-type speedometer, a thermometer and a
fuel gauge are mounted in a rectangular panel behind the elegant two-spoke
wheel, high up and close to the line of sight, and above them is a row of
labelled warning lights which are far too conspicious to be overlooked. The only
other instrument is an electric clock centrally mounted on a broad strip of
African walnut grain which runs right round the car at window sill height. This
facia layout, although unusually short of instruments for a Rover, leaves room
for a large shelf below the screen with a non-reflecting black finish;
underneath is a row of switches recognizable by labels, by symbols (several of
them obscure) and by proper shaping according to their direction of movement.
The sidelamp switch has a position for two parking lamps only,
and a push on the rotating knob of the variable-speed wipers brings
electrically-operated washer jets into action. A long lever projects from each
side of the steering column, the left-hand one controlling the headlamp dipping
or flashing all four headlights, and the right-hand one operating the horn and
direction indicators. Below the facia on each side are large drop-down glove
lockers, hinged above the ankles and making clever use of what would normally be
wasted space.
Their lids are heavily padded and so are the sun visors and the
mirror surround. Both visors have vanity mirrors, but it seems doubtful whether
this is desirable on the driver“s side. Safety belt mountings are built in, but
the easily adjustable Irvin harness fitted to the test car is an optional extra.
The car is very well equipped with all the fittings which make for an owner“s
convenience, including boot and under-bonnet lights.
0-60 mph 14.6 sec.
top speed 104 mph
overall fuel consumption 23.0 mpg
Motor / UK
October 1963
BACK
|